Use for 1,3-propanediol derivatives

ABSTRACT

Use of a compound of formula I                    
     wherein 
     R 1  is an optionally substituted straight- or branched carbon chain having 12 to 22 carbon atoms which may be optionally interrupted by an optionally substituted phenylene, and 
     each of R 2 , R 3 , R 4  and R 5 , independently, is H or lower alkyl, in free form or in pharmaceutically acceptable salt form, 
     in the prevention or treatment of chronic rejection in a recipient of organ or tissue allo- or xenotransplant, or of acute rejection in a xenograft transplant recipient.

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/308,098, filed May 17, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,274,629 B1, which is a 371 of PCT/EP97/06408, filed Nov. 17, 1997.

The present invention relates to a new use for a compound group comprising 2-amino-1,3-propanediol derivatives.

Compounds for use according to the invention are compounds of formula I

wherein

R₁ is an optionally substituted straight- or branched carbon chain having 12 to 22 carbon atoms which may be optionally interrupted by an optionally substituted phenylene, and

each of R₂, R₃, R₄ and R₅, independently, is H or lower alkyl, in free form or in pharmaceutically acceptable salt form.

When the carbon chain as R₁ is substituted, it is preferably substituted by halogen, nitro, amino, hydroxy or carboxy. When the carbon chain is interrupted by an optionally substituted phenylene, the carbon chain is preferably unsubstituted. When the phenylene moiety is substituted, it is preferably substituted by halogen, nitro, amino, methoxy, hydroxy or carboxy.

Such compounds are disclosed in EP-A1-627,406 the relevant disclosure of which, in particular with respect to the compounds, is incorporated herein by reference.

Preferred compounds of formula I are those wherein R₁ is a straight or branched, preferably straight, chain alkyl having 13 to 20 carbon atoms, optionally substituted by nitro, halogen, amino, hydroxy or carboxy, and, more preferably those wherein R₁ is phenylalkyl substituted by a straight or branched C₆₋₁₄ alkyl chain optionally substituted by halogen and the alkyl moiety is a C₆₋₁₄ alkyl optionally substituted by hydroxy. More preferably, R₁ is phenyl-C₁₋₆ alkyl substituted on the phenyl by a straight or branched, preferably straight, C₆₋₁₄ alkyl chain. The C₆₋₁₄ alkyl chain may be in ortho, meta or para, preferably in para.

Preferably each of R₂ to R₅ is H.

Examples of the pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the compounds of the formula (I) include salts with inorganic acids, such as hydrochloride, hydrobromide and sulfate, salts with organic acids, such as acetate, fumarate, maleate, benzoate, citrate, malate, methanesulfonate and benzenesulfonate salts, and when a carboxy group is present, salts with metals such as sodium, potassium, calcium and aluminium, salts with amines, such as triethylamine and salts with dibasic amino acids, such as lysine. The compounds and salts of the present invention encompass hydrate and solvate forms.

When the compounds of formula I have one or more asymmetric centers in the molecule, the present invention is to be understood as embracing the various optical isomers, as well as racemates, diastereoisomers and mixtures thereof are embraced.

Particularly preferred compounds of formula I are 2-amino-2-tetradecyl-1,3-propanediol and especially 2-amino-2-[2-(4-octylphenyl)ethyl]-1,3-propanediol, (hereinafter Compound A) e.g. in hydrochloride form.

Compounds of formula I have, on the basis of observed activity, e.g. as described in EP-A1-627,406 been found to be useful e.g. as immunosuppressant, e.g. in the treatment of acute allograft rejection.

Organ transplants of liver, kidney, lung and heart are now regularly performed as treatment for endstage organ disease. Allograft as well as xenograft transplants have been performed. However, because of problems with long-term chronic rejection, organ transplantation is not yet a permanent solution to irreversible organ disease. Chronic rejection, which manifests as progressive and irreversible graft dysfunction, is the leading cause of organ transplant loss, in some cases already after the first postoperative year. The clinical problem of chronic rejection is clear from transplantation survival times; about half of kidney allografts are lost within 5 years after transplantation, and a similar value is observed in patients with a heart allograft.

Chronic rejection is considered as a multifactorial process in which not only the immune reaction towards the graft but also the response of the blood vessel wall in the grafted organ to injury (“response-to-injury” reaction) plays a role. The variant of chronic rejection with the worst prognosis is an arteriosclerosis-like alteration, also called transplant vasculopathy graft vessel disease, graft atherosclerosis, transplant coronary disease, etc. This vascular lesion is characterized by migration and proliferation of smooth muscle cells under influence of growth factors, that are amongst others synthesized by endothelium. It appears to progress also through repetitive endothelial injury induced amongst others by host antibody or antigen-antibody complexes, through intimal proliferation and thickening, smooth muscle cell hypertrophy repair, and finally to gradual luminal obliteration. Also so-called non-immunological factors like hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hypercholesterolemia etc. play a role.

Chronic rejection appears to be inexorable and uncontrollable because there is no known effective treatment or prevention modality. Thus, there continues to exist a need for a treatment effective in preventing, controlling or reversing manifestations of chronic graft vessel diseases.

In accordance with the present invention, it has now surprisingly been found that compounds of formula I in free form or in pharmaceutically acceptable salt form inhibit graft vessel disease and are particularly indicated to prevent or treat chronic rejection in a transplanted organ.

Furthermore, it has also been found that compounds of formula I in free form or in pharmaceutically acceptable salt form suppress xenograft rejection. In accordance with the particular findings of the present invention, there is provided:

1.1. A method of preventing or treating manifestations of chronic rejection, e.g. to avoid, reduce or restrict chronic rejection, in a recipient of organ or tissue allo- or xeno-transplant, e.g. heart, lung, combined heart-lung, liver, kidney or pancreatic transplant, comprising the step of administering to said recipient a therapeutically effective amount of a compound of formula I in free form or in pharmaceutically acceptable salt form;

1.2. A method of preventing or treating graft vessel diseases, e.g. transplant vasculopathy, arteriosclerosis or atherosclerosis, in a recipient of organ or tissue allo- or xeno-transplant, e.g. heart, lung, combined heart-lung, liver, kidney or pancreatic transplants, comprising the step of administering to said recipient a therapeutically effective amount of a compound of formula I in free form or in pharmaceutically acceptable salt form;

In a series of further specific or alternative embodiments, the present invention also provides:

2. A method of preventing or controlling acute rejection in a xenograft transplant recipient, e.g. a patient receiving a heart, lung, combined heart-lung, kidney, liver, bone marrow, pancreatic bowel, skin or corneal xenotransplant, comprising administering to said recipient a therapeutically effective amount of a compound of formula I in free form or in pharmaceutically acceptable salt form.

As alternative to the above the present invention also provides:

3. A compound of formula I in free form or in pharmaceutically acceptable salt form for use in any method as defined under 1 or 2 above; or

4. A compound of formula I in free form or in pharmaceutically acceptable salt form for use in the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for use in any method as defined under 1 or 2 above; or

5. A pharmaceutical composition for use in any method as defined under 1 or 2 above comprising a compound of formula I in free form or in pharmaceutically acceptable salt form together with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable diluents or carriers therefor.

Utility of the compounds of formula I in free form or in pharmaceutically acceptable salt form in chronic rejection, as well as utility in treating diseases and conditions as hereinabove specified, may be demonstrated in animal tests for example in accordance with the methods hereinafter described, as well as in clinic where e.g. the transplanted organ or tissue may be submitted to regular biopsy controls and in the case of heart transplant additionally to ultrasound scanning.

A. Prevention of Graft Vessel Disease

Experimental animals:

Inbred rat strains DA (RT1^(a), donors) and Lewis (RT1¹, recipients of allografts), weighing between 200 and 350 grams are used. The animals are allowed unrestricted access to food and water before and after the operation.

Carotid artery transplantation:

The rats are anaesthetised with isofluorane (Abbott), (4-5% for induction, 1.5-2% for maintenance) and 300 μg atropin sulphate is injected subcutaneously following the induction. The left carotid artery is dissected free. The artery is clamped proximally and distally and a segment of about 7-10 mm is removed. The gap is bridged by an allograft which had also been subjected to 45 min cold ischemia. Ethilon 10/o sutures are used. Finally the skin is closed with 4/0 sutures. If needed, an Alzet osmotic minipump (Alza Corp. Palo Alto, Calif.) is then implanted subcutaneously over the back (alternatively the animals are treated orally).

The rats are subject to one of the following treatments: A compound of formula I alone at the doses of 0.1 to 10 mg/kg, or in combination with Cyclosporin A at the dose of 0.03, 0.3, or 1 mg.kg⁻¹·day⁻¹ is administered for 8 weeks either by using Alzet osmotic minipumps implanted subcutaneously or alternatively by oral administration. At 8 weeks the rats are sacrificed, the carotid arteries are perfused for 1 min with 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline solution (PBS, pH 7.4) and then for 15 min with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The carotid arteries are then excised and stained in Giemsa solution for histological evaluation. Morphometric analysis includes the measurement of the thickness of the media and intima. A qualitative analysis of the morphological changes includes a scoring on an 0-3 scale for adventitial infiltration of mononuclear cells and necrosis (vacuolar degeneration, hypertrophy of cells), the number of smooth muscle cells (SMC) nuclei in the media (0-10, <100, >100 and >>100 nuclei for scores, 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively, SMC necrosis (vacuolar degeneration and hypertrophy of SMC) and the intimal infiltration of mononuclear cells (13).

In both experiments, the compounds of formula I, particularly Compound A in hydrochloride form, significantly inhibit graft infiltration and neointima formation.

B. In vivo heart xenotransplantation (hamster-to-rat)

The hamster-into-rat xenograft combination is a so-called difficult concordant combination. Rats do not have natural anti-hamster antibody in sufficient amounts to yield immediate hyperacute rejection as observed in concordant combinations; however, rejection in untreated recipients occurs within 3-4 days, by antibodies in combination with complement. This is visualized in histology by destruction of blood vessels, exsudation and extravasation of erythrocytes, and influx by polymorphonuclear granulocytes; often there are signs of hemorrhage and thrombosis. Once this rejection has been overcome by effective inhibition of antibody synthesis or complement inactivation, a cellular rejection can emerge later on. This is visualized in histology by influx of mononuclear cells, including lymphocytes, lymphoblastoid cells, and macrophages, and destruction of the myocyte parenchyma. The inhibition of cellular rejection requires more immuno-suppression than that of allografts. Congenitally athymic (rnu/rnu) rats lack a competent (thymus-dependent) cellular immune system and generally are unable to reject allografts. Such animals do reject a hamster xenograft within 3-4 days in a similar fashion as euthymic rats, indicative that (at least part of) anti-hamster antibody synthesis in rats occurs following a thymus-independent B-cell response. Such recipients are useful in hamster xenografting to evaluate rejection by thymus-independent antibody-mediated rejection.

The heart of a Syrian hamster is heterotopically transplanted in the abdomen of a male Lewis (RT1′) rat with anastomoses between the donor and recipient's aorta and the donor right pulmonary artery to the recipient's inferior vena cava. The graft is monitored daily by palpation of the abdomen. Rejection is concluded in case of cessation of heart beat. Animals are weighed weekly. In the present series of experiments, the endpoint is set to 28 days. Animals are subjected to autopsy; apart from the graft, weight and histology is assessed for thymus, spleen, liver, seminal vesicles and testes. Blood is taken and processed to serum for the determination of cytolytic anti-hamster erythrocyte antibody and hemolytic complement activity.

Compounds are dissolved in water and administered daily orally in a volume of 2 ml/kg body weight. Administration of 5-30 mg/kg/day, of a compound of Formula I, e.g. Compound A in hydrochloride form, results in prolonged graft survival, in both athymic and euthymic recipients.

Daily dosages required in practicing the method of the present invention will vary depending upon, for example, the compound of formula I employed, the host, the mode of administration, the severity of the condition to be treated, and the optionally concomitantly used immunosuppressive drug e.g. CysA. A preferred daily dosage range is about from 0.03 to 2.5 mg/kg per day, particularly 0.1 to 2.5 mg/kg per day, e.g. 0.5 to 2.5 mg/kg per day as a single dose or in divided doses. Suitable daily dosages for patients are on the order of from e.g. 1 to 100 mg p.o. Suitable unit dosage forms for oral administration comprise from ca. 1 to 50 mg, usually 5 to 30 mg active ingredient, e.g. Compound A, e.g. in hydrochloride form, together with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable diluents or carriers therefor. As an alternative, the compound of formula I in free form or in pharmaceutically acceptable salt form may also be administered twice or three times a week, e.g. at a dosage as indicated above.

The compounds of formula I may be administered by any conventional route, in particular enterally, e.g. orally, for example in the form of solutions for drinking, tablets or capsules or parenterally, for example in the form of injectable solutions or suspensions. Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compounds of formula I may be manufactured in conventional manner, e.g. as described in EP-A1-627,406.

The compounds of formula I may be administered as the sole active ingredient or together with other drugs in immunomodulating regimens or other anti-inflammatory agents. For example, the compounds of formula I may be used in combination with cyclosporins, rapamycins or ascomycins, or their immunosuppressive analogs, e.g. cyclosporin A, cyclosporin G, FK-506, rapamycin, 40-O-(2-hydroxy)ethyl-rapamycin, etc.; corticosteroids; cyclophosphamide; azathioprene; methotrexate; brequinar; leflunomide; mizoribine; mycophenolic acid; mycophenolate mofetil; 15-deoxyspergualine; immuno-suppressive monoclonal antibodies, e.g., monoclonal antibodies to leukocyte receptors, e.g., to MHC, CD2, CD3, CD4, CD7, CD25, CD28, B7, CD40, CD45, or CD58 or to their ligands; or other immunomodulatory compounds, e.g. CTLA4-Ig.

Where the compounds of formula I are administered in conjunction with other immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory therapy, e.g. for preventing or treating chronic rejection as hereinabove specified, dosages of the co-administered immunosuppressant or immuno-modulatory compound will of course vary depending on the type of co-drug employed, e.g. whether it is a steroid or a cyclosporin, on the specific drug employed, on the condition being treated, and so forth. In accordance with the foregoing the present invention provides in a yet further aspect:

6. A method as defined above comprising co-administration, e.g. concomitantly or in sequence, of a therapeutically effective amount of a compound of formula I and a second drug substance, said second drug substance being an immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory drug, e.g. as set forth above.

7. A kit or package for use in any method as defined under 1 or 2 above, comprising a compound of formula I, in free form or in pharmaceutically acceptable salt form, with at least one pharmaceutical composition comprising an immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory drug. The kit or package may comprise instructions for its administration.

FORMULATION EXAMPLE Soft Capsules

Compound of formula I,

e.g. Compound A  30 mg Polyethylene glycol 300 300 mg Polysorbate 80  20 mg Total 350 mg

Compounds of formula I in free form or in pharmaceutically acceptable salt form are well tolerated at dosages required for use in accordance with the present invention. For example, the acute LD₅₀ is >10 mg/kg p.o. in rats and monkeys. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of preventing or treating chronic rejection in a patient receiving an organ or tissue allo-transplant comprising administering to the patient an effective amount of 2-amino-2-[2-(4-octylphenyl)ethyl]-1,3-propanediol or its pharmaceutically acceptable salt with an effective amount of a second immunomodulatory or anti-inflammatory agent selected from the group consisting of a cyclosporin, a rapamycin, an ascomycin, a corticosteroid, cyclophosphamide, azathioprene, methotrexate, bequinar, leflunomide, mizoribine, 15-deoxyspergualine, immunosupressive monoclonal antibodies, and CTLA4-lg.
 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is FK-506 or monoclonal antibodies to leucocyte receptors or to their ligands.
 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is monoclonal antibodies to MHC, CD2, CD3, CD4, CD7, CD25, CD28, B7, CD40, CD45, CD58, or to ligands thereof.
 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the second agent is monoclonal antibodies to CD3 or Cd40.
 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is rapamycin.
 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is ascomycin.
 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is cyclosporin A.
 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is cyclosporin G.
 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is cyclophosphamide.
 10. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is azathioprene.
 11. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is methotrexate.
 12. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is bequinar.
 13. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is leflunomide.
 14. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is mizoribine.
 15. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is 15-deoxyspergualine.
 16. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is monoclonal antibodies to leukocyte receptors or their ligands.
 17. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is CTLA4-lg.
 18. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is monoclonal antibodies to CD3 or to a ligand thereof.
 19. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is monoclonal antibodies to CD40 or to a ligand thereof.
 20. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is monoclonal antibodies to a ligand of CD40.
 21. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is monoclonal antibodies to CD45 or to a ligand thereof.
 22. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is monoclonal antibodies to CD28 or to a ligand thereof.
 23. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is monoclonal antibodies to B7 or to a ligand thereof.
 24. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is a corticosteroid.
 25. The method of claim 1 wherein the second agent is FK-506. 